Chart of Day: Cameco Corp. (CCJ) – 2/6

Uranium prices are running hot again, which could force Cameco Corp. (CCJ) even higher.

For one, “Geopolitical uncertainty and concerns about the security of uranium supply continue to be the driving forces behind the ongoing uranium rally,” noted Jacob White, Sprott Asset Management ETF product manager, as quoted by ETFTrends.com.

Two, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, miners are already flooded with projects as demand for the metal increases.

ccj

“Miners are struggling to get enough uranium out of the ground. That is helping to push prices of the nuclear fuel to nearly 16-year highs,” they added. Plus, Cameco “recently said it may need to buy more uranium before the end of this year to meet obligations to customers after suffering setbacks at key mines.”

All of which should force uranium prices even higher in 2024.

About 22 countries, including the U.S., Canada, the UK, and France pledged to triple their nuclear capacity by 2050 at the 28th Annual UN Climate Change Conference (COP28).

According to Forbes, “About 175 more nations gave their tacit approval to nuclear by electing to triple their use of renewables by 2030 and phase down fossil fuels.” All of which could be great news for uranium companies, such as UR-Energy.

deal of the month

best growth stocks

Alliance

Bundle package – lifetime subscriptions for all products

Categories

Recent posts

Tags

Connect with Us

Get FREE Daily Stock Tips

Join and receive market insider stock picks, trade alerts and unique investing insights
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
By clicking the "Subscribe" button you are accepting our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Join Waitlist

We’re sorry, but due to the popularity of our services, we have reached our max number of subscribers and are not currently accepting more. If spots become available, we will be sure to contact you. Please join the waitlist below.
Thank You!

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.